Our paper about Wikipedia Thesaurus construction is accepted by WISE2007, one of the top conferences for WWW researchers. Only less than 20% of papers are accepted thus it was competitive.
However, I believe that acceptance rate is not effective to know the grade of conferences sometimes. There are some conferences which are very competitive but not high quality.
How can we know the "real grade" is a difficult issue for us researchers, right?
I found several interesting Web site for ranking journals and conferences in computer science area.
1) 2007 Ranking of ICT Conferences
2) Computer Science Conference Rankings (guofei)
3) Computer Science Conference Rankings (zaiane)
They are subjective sometimes. #1 and #3 are saying that WISE is good conference but #2 is not.
Hummm, how can we know the quality after all?
#1 is interesting, by the way. They have rules and processes to rank conferences (The rules and processes).
After all, from above rankings, I concluded that WISE is a high quality conference and the point is, I'm gonna go to France anyway. Yay.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿